Wednesday 15 May 2013


The Trademark Clearinghouse: how to use it effectively  


With ICANN’s Trademark Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) receiving more attention now that it has officially launched and is accepting trademark data deposits, key Clearinghouse‑related information and strategy questions are highlighted below.

First things first, the Clearinghouse is not a Rights Protection Mechanism; it is a cost management system. It was designed to allow trademark owners to deposit their trademark information into one centrally managed database for a single fee. Historically, new registries (such as .info or .biz, or more recently .xxx) have individually charged rights owners to “validate” the same trademark registration data. Trademark owners told ICANN that this model would not scale to over a thousand new gTLDs, so ICANN created the Clearinghouse to streamline and centralise trademark data validations.

Trademarks submitted to and validated by the Clearinghouse can be used, subject to ICANN’s “proof of use” requirements, to participate in new gTLD Sunrises. There is an exclusive 30-day priority period for eligible trademark owners to obtain a domain name matching their trademark prior to general public availability. These Sunrise registration opportunities are largely used by trademark owners for defensive purposes (i.e. to pre-empt cybersquatters).

In addition to Sunrises, ICANN will require new gTLD registries to provide a Trademark Claims service. Claims are a 90-day period following Sunrise where trademark owners are notified via the Clearinghouse of any domain registrations in new gTLDs that match their marks (however, this notification occurs after the registration and does not block a potentially infringing registration from occurring in the first place).

Some considerations for your Trademark Clearinghouse strategy: 

  • Which marks to submit: Review the unrestricted registries where you need protection. Do they have a nexus requirement; for example, if you want protection in the .paris and .berlin registries, do you have one mark covering both jurisdictions or will you need to submit two marks? Do your preferred marks carry up-to-date ownership details? Will there be issues around assignees? What proof of use will you supply (mandatory if you want to participate in a new gTLD Sunrise)?
  • Timing: Deloitte, the validation provider, has said that it takes them 20 calendar days to process an application. ICANN requires new registries to give 30 days’ notice before they open. A ten-day margin is not much. The active life of your Clearinghouse submission will commence when the first registry goes live. As new gTLDs are launched on a rolling basis, you may not need to use the Clearinghouse until 18 months from now, or you may be interested in the very first batch of new gTLDs.
  • Subscription options: How long do you wish to subscribe your mark to the Clearinghouse? Deloitte are offering one, three, and five year options. As every new registry should be open within two years, a one year subscription may be too short but three may be too long.
  • Whether to use an agent: Whether you will liaise directly with the Clearinghouse or partner with an intermediary. If you go straight to the Clearinghouse yourself, you should be ready to pay Deloitte directly via credit card, and you can only pay for ten registrations at a time (apparently for security). If you wish to act as an agent, you must pre-pay a $15,000 deposit to the Clearinghouse. You will also be required to store and manage Signed Marked Data (SMD) files.
  • Trademark Claims notices: Who in your organisation will receive these notices across the 90 days for which they last? How will you react if a registration is made by a third-party regardless of a Claims notice? Have you got a list of up to 50 abused “brand-plus” terms (such as “lego-toys”) that have been the subject of UDRP or Court Actions on which you can also receive claims notices? What happens if such terms are applied for in the .auto registry when your registrations are in Class 15 for Musical Instruments?
  • Costs: Deloitte have developed a complex pricing structure. The official fees are $150 for a single mark for one year, $435 for three years, and $725 for five years. Renewal costs are the same as submission costs (which in our view is unjustifiably steep, as re-validation is not very arduous). Com Laude's fees start at £80, and they are pleased to offer volume discounts and preferential rates for existing clients.

Finally, remember that the Clearinghouse is a floor not a ceiling. Inclusion in the Clearinghouse does not necessarily mean that you will be able to participate in the first phase of every Sunrise. Some registries will, for example, be prioritising marks owned by local companies before anyone else.


Contact tmch@comlaude.com  or +44 (0)20 7421 8250 for more information. 

Com Laude offers corporate domain name management and online trademark protection for corporations worldwide. In addition, Com Laude offers the advice brand owners need in order to formulate a sharp strategy with regard to domain name registration in all the new gTLDs at the second level.

Monday 13 May 2013


Domain name developments from Com Laude

Here is the spring edition of Com Laude's newsletter [PDF].

Topic's covered include: 



Excerpts:


New gTLD overview


In April 2012, ICANN received 1930 applications for 1409 unique character strings, of which 116 were IDNs (in scripts other than ASCII such as Arabic or Cyrillic); 899 of these applications were for keywords (meaning descriptive terms) applied for by investors; 637 or 33% were for company or brand names; 255 or 13% were keywords applied for by brand owners (Walmart and Safeway both applied for.grocery); and 139 or 7% were for community or geographic terms (.lat; .paris).

Application for a 10 year licence to operate a gTLD registry, with a presumption of renewal, cost $185,000. Any incorporated organisation could apply for any string, except those which
appeared on ICANN’s list of reserved names and the ISO3166 A and B lists of country codes and protected geographic terms. There were no restrictions on industry leaders applying for
industry terms or investors seeking to run a registry targeted at a regulated sector. There was no public interest test. Each application (numbering in the region of 250 pages) is being evaluated on operational, financial and technical grounds and has to score 30 marks or more out of 41 to pass. Each applicant had to submit to background checks. A Letter of Credit to the value of three years of emergency registry operation was required as well as a contract with an Escrow Provider. Most applicants selected as their Registry Service Provider a proven
operator of gTLD or ccTLD systems. Where two or more applicants have applied for the same string, the mechanism of last resort if the applicants cannot find a solution amongst themselves is an ICANN sponsored winner-takes-all auction. The order in which applications are processed was decided by a Prioritisation Draw held in Los Angeles in December 2012:
IDN applications were batched first, then ASCII applications.


Trademark Clearinghouse update


On 26 March 2013, the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) finally began accepting trademark data for validation. The TMCH is a platform for cost effective rights protection in the new gTLD space, which will allow trademark owners to deposit their mark information into one centrally managed database for one fee. 

Trademarks successfully submitted to the TMCH can be used, subject to proof of use requirements, to participate in all new gTLD Sunrises (a 30 day period when trademark owners can apply to a registry to obtain a domain name matching its trademark) and the Trademark Claims service (a 90 day period following Sunrise where trademark owners are notified via the TMCH of any domain registrations in new gTLDs that match their marks).

The technical system is still being developed and is targeted to roll out by 1 July 2013. ICANN also revealed that they have agreed on a one off charge of $5,000 per gTLD for registries to
connect to the TMCH. This is significantly less than the figures that were suggested originally (ranging from $10-15,000), and is partly due to an ICANN subsidy of $400,000 which they
will pay to the TMCH to offset some of the potential cost for the registries. It still nets Deloitte and IBM a cool $7.5m for a service that is incomplete and six months late.

In addition, a $0.30 fee will be charged to registries per domain registration during the Sunrise and Claims periods.


Contact info@comlaude.com or +44 (0)20 7421 8250 for more information. 

Com Laude offers corporate domain name management and online trademark protection for corporations worldwide. In addition, Com Laude offers the advice brand owners need in order to formulate a sharp strategy with regard to domain name registration in all the new gTLDs at the second level.